greetings from limbo!

September 2nd, 2008

when last we met, many moons ago, i was bitching about cubicle life and all that it entailed. and now, you will be excited to know that i will now be bitching about the lack of cubicle life! yes, it’s true - the uninvited editor has officially transitioned to the unemployed editor. as you can see, my state of uninvitedness has grown! i try not to brag.

this is my first official day of idleness. i woke up early and wrestled it to the ground. i went for a run around the block at 9am. (yes, one block. believe me, it was plenty.) i put all my documents in order, donned my most pathetic outfit (so many to choose from!) and began the walk through my favorite sunny park to the unemployment office with a skip in my step. there were other people around, and they all seemed cheery. adorable children! crotchety old men who refuse to walk with canes! retirees playing tennis! various people like myself who should have been working! on the way i imagined this blog post, and realized that i haven’t been blogging because i feel that blog posts should a) be witty and b) have a point. at least, the old, gainfully employed me thought that. but no more! one need not be “witty” or “interesting” or “half-way lucid.” one does not need to have “a point.” that’s cubicle thinking! no, the new me can just “be”!!!

[this may well mean that the readership of this blog will dwindle from its present, oh, three, to about zero. great! that’s fine! i don’t need you and your judginess! get back to work!]

ANYWAY. when i got to the unemployment office, i was told that i had to come back at one, because “he” was about to go out to lunch. it was 11.30. wait, whuh? there’s ONE DUDE processing applications, in a freakin RECESSION? damn. that is lame. the guy said i was welcome to hang out in the meantime, and maybe do some job searching, and gestured toward the roomful of industrious jobseekers tapping away on their keyboards. that looked a little too much like work, and sort of depressing. it would totally ruin the temporary high of navigating this brave new world. so i figured i’d come back here and write about this exciting experience instead, before i lose my nerve and try to get “witty” again.

by the way, i totally know that i could do all of this unemployment stuff over the phone, or maybe even those amazing internets. yes, but then i’d have NOTHING to write about, would i? and THEN where would we all be? i shudder to imagine.

millions of men are waiting to annoy you: picaresque tales

November 8th, 2007

this morning on the subway i very very nearly went up to a random guy and offered unsolicited fashion advice. (in the end, i was too wimpy.) he was young, fairly good-looking, well dressed, asian. nice scarf, trendy bag. he was also wearing a coat that still had the thread that holds the back vent closed. worse, it was a long coat, so when he walked the gap became painfully apparent. this is one of my extreme peeves. why do so many otherwise-fairly-together people not seem to know about this? okay, i’m telling you now: when you buy a new winter coat, look at the back. is there a back vent? is it sewn closed with a loose “X” of thread? if so, CUT THE FUCKING THREAD. it will make me less irritated, and it will make you look like less of a giant doofus. thank you. crikey.

a couple weeks ago i was confronted with a phenomenon that, while familiar, had not happened to me for a long long while. as in years. this is a good thing. the phenomenon is this: girl walking down street passes guy walking down street. perfect strangers. the guy speaks. he says: “smile!”

ahem. okay, i KNOW we’ve been over this before. dudes: DO NOT DO THAT. IT IS PATRONIZING AND ANNOYING. girls are not there to smile and be cute on command for your pleasure. i am extremely certain that you would not say that to another dude. probably because you don’t want to get your ass kicked. which you totally would, because you are being PATRONIZING AND ANNOYING. yeesh.

i’ll tell you a secret, though, you passing guys, of what rarely goes unappreciated, for me anyway. it’s the nonverbal “you are so cute that you’re making ME smile!” smile. you might even get a return smile for that one. the other way, you most definitely won’t. you might get your ass kicked though. maybe i’ll even smile a little while i do it.

also a couple weeks ago, i was crossing boylston street for my weekly lunchtime browse at marshalls. a dude approached. he was black and had long dreadlocks. he also had a clipboard and was wearing a bright red jacket. he asked if he could ask me a question. i said no and kept walking. he turned and yelled, “you look PREJUDICE!” ahem. okay, let me be the first to say, i AM prejudice. i am extremely prejudice against people eagerly hanging around on boylston street with red jackets and clipboards. sometimes i’m also prejudice against blue jackets. in fact, my prejudice is so apparent that these people by and large do not even bother to approach me. this is a good thing, because i do not like to have to reply, “nah, not really” when asked whether i care about the planet or the starving children ’round the globe. (oh, okay. i like it a teeny bit.) so, yes, usual disclaimer about how indeed i do give to charity and yada yada yada. but, like most people, i prefer to give to charity on my own terms and not because i’m being harangued into it by annoying people on the street. it’s kind of like, smiling when you feel like smiling! hmm!

so just last night i finished reading a book. it was called “millions of women are waiting to meet you” by sean thomas. it was from the library. i get a lot of crappy books from the library. i mean, i look for shiny covers, attractive fonts, and cute graphics. why does it so often go horribly wrong? anyway, this book was a memoir, about a latethirtysomething dude in london and his internet dating experiences. i like internet dating stories, and i rarely get to hear them from guys, so i figured it would make for good subway reading. eh. it started out boring and obvious and tediously written, and it ended up sort of disturbing, annoying, and ultimately depressing. this dude at first seemed like your typical type - kinda hip, kinda okay, kinda funny and smart, but actually not really any of those things. not edgy, or original. basically unimpressive. then later in the book he starts revealing all his past sexual experiences, of which there were plenty. okay, fine. but then when he gets to the part where he’s in his mid-thirties and making special trips to bangkok to hang out in pussy clubs and bang a whole bunch of thai hookers? one of whom he thinks he’s impregnated? because he was having unprotected sex with her? whoa. that’s bringing it up a notch. or down. okay, so i’ve spent some time in southeast asia and have known a few guys who weren’t averse to frequenting similar clubs on occasion, and i didn’t really think anything of it. but they were in their twenties. and they weren’t going to patpong every night for like, three months. guys who did do that (and the term for it is “sex tourist” - ew) were generally regarded as giant losers, and worse. so whatever, writer-dude - you totally lost me. but then we come to the end. basically, after a year of messing around on the internet dating sites (and this was all in the name of research, of course, as he was writing an article about it), he went off it for a bit, and then he went back. he decided he was going to get serious. he was ready to meet someone. he wrote some gal a long email about himself. she wrote back. they dated. they’re married. hallelujah!

okay, UGH. this is just more evidence of what i have always suspected: namely, some dudes just fuck around until they’re “ready,” and when they determine they are, the next chick who comes along who isn’t totally fug is IT. she’s the one! happily ever after! soul mates! thinking about it, i don’t know why i find this so annoying. i guess because these dudes seem so lame and deluded: when they find their IT girl they tell themselves it’s because she’s the one they’ve been waiting for all their lives, not because they just decided one day (usually when they’re losing their hair) that they have finally had sex with enough people. IRRITATING! guess what, i’m ready to settle down! you’re the one, you lucky girl. i’m done banging hookers. SMILE!

gag.

organically grown kvetching

October 8th, 2007

okay, so one thing that is sometimes not so bad about being petite is that i can occasionally buy kids’ clothes, which tend to come at a discount. for example, i bought a kid’s sweater at marshall’s the other day for $16.99, while i think a grown-up sweater would probably set me back at least $18.99. so those two dollars can make me think about how lucky i am to still have the bust of a 10-12-year-old. that is, a 10-12-year-old wearing a tight, form-fitting sweater!

all right, you probably have the wrong idea of me now. the sweater is totally not tight. neither is it pink, nor sparkly, nor does it have writing on it of any kind. it doesn’t even have a hood. it is a rather refined sweater for the rather refined 10-12-year-old. in fact, the only tip-off is the label, which reads: Organically Grown Kids.

isn’t that cute! who wouldn’t want their kid to be swathed in Organically Grown clothing? how healthy! how earthy! how non-fire-retardant! okay, let’s see what we’ve got here:

30% rayon
20% nylon
20% cotton
20% lambswool
10% angora rabbit hair

MADE IN CHINA

all righty, so your precious fifth grader may have only the most organic of materials to wrap around her bony little frame, but it comes at the expense of angora bunny rabbits and like, kids in china. and also, is there any such thing as organic NYLON?

[over]

HAND WASH COLD
DO NOT TWIST OR WRING
RESHAPE AND DRY FLAT
OR DRY CLEAN

oh hahahaha. that’s funny. a kid’s sweater made of chinese rabbits that you have to dry clean. clearly, we have lost sight of the purpose of kids. which is that they can be dressed in small, cheap, machine-washable clothes, and still look cute. am i right? am i right? am i on the blacklist? am i going to have my tubes forcibly tied? sigh. i pity my as-yet-unconceivable children. [hee. that was a typo, but it’s actually more fitting than what i intended to write.]

moral of the story: this is what happens when they tell you that writing something is better than writing nothing. okay, no one told me that. they know better.

oh, hey. so uh…what are YOU doing here?

September 17th, 2007

the uninvited editor: it is i! or: it is me! perhaps i am not deserving of the title, because i could actually go either way with that one. the uninvited editor: c’est moi! see, sometimes i’m down with the french.

em em
IS
the uninvited editor

(okay, i’m going to apologize just the one time for not using capitals, and break the news that that is probably not going to change. yes, i know, it’s annoying and juvenile and sometimes hard to read. what can i say: c’est moi!)

so now that i’ve created this new persona that is so very twentieth-century, i’ve had to do some very deeeeep soul searching and ask myself: what-or-who IS the uninvited editor? what is the INNER ESSENCE of the character? i mean, apart from the name being kind of hard to type (i’m totally gonna create a macro, once i figure out how to do it) and difficult to parse when the words are all run in together (hello, domain name!), and actually the more i look at it, the odder it appears, visually. awkward to pronounce, too. it’s like another language. wait, why did i do this, again? boy did i totally not think it through. okay ANYWAY. so i thought back to the then-unheralded birth of the uninvited editor, last thursday, when my erstwhile colleague responded to a comment i had made regarding her blog:

[13:49] Kiki: i amended the post
[13:49] Kiki: :-)
[13:56] Em Em: em em - the unwanted editor
[13:57] Em Em: or… unprovoked?
[13:57] Kiki: haha
[13:57] Em Em: hmmm
[13:57] Em Em: i just spent 35 bucks at marshalls
[13:57] Kiki: the “f.u. write ur own posts mutherfucker” response was hastily written then deleted when i realized u were correct

and there we have it: the first response to the uninvited editor is fuck off! quickly followed by resigned acceptance of my innate rightness. it happened again today, sort of, in another shining moment for the uninvited editor. in my new department at work we have weekly meetings. whee! so i guess for normal people, the five minutes before the boss shows up is a happy and relaxed time to shoot the shit with your coworkers and generally be footloose and fancy free before you turn back into the robot that gives progress reports on various projects. an all too short moment when one can be oneself and not worry about the hypercriticism that so defines today’s workplace. so, blah blah, pac man, hello kitty, oh and did you guys hear that in japan they make the police officers wear hello kitty decals when they’re bad.

me: it’s thailand.
guy: oh, right.
me: japan is too civilized for that.
guy: okay.
me [schwarzenegger voice]: you are like a little girl.
guy: uh…what’s your name again?

okay, he didn’t say the last thing. there was just a long silence until the boss came in.

so, the uninvited editor’s modus operandi:

1) unprovoked correction.
2) questionable editorial.
3) barely lucid nonsequitur.

4) awkward silence.

anyway, i think my new job is going really well. i’m sure to make lots of new friends, once people realize that the more they talk to me, the more i can tell them what the right thing is. everybody can enjoy that!

the small print: please note that correction of me, grammatical or otherwise, is not allowed. great! now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, i’m feeling really good about this relationship. i really think we’re gonna make a great team. now, who’s got birthday cake?

[awkward silence]